Testing vs Attestation - What's the difference?
testing | attestation |
difficult, tough
* {{quote-news
, year=2011
, date=June 4
, author=Phil McNulty
, title=England 2 - 2 Switzerland
, work=BBC
The act of conducting a test; trialing, proving.
* 2011 , Emerson B. Powery, Immersion Bible Studies: Luke
A thing that serves to bear witness, confirm, authenticate, validation, verification, documentation.
A confirmation or authentication.
(business, finance) The process, performed by accountants or auditors, of providing independent opinion on published financial and other business information of a business, public agency, or other organization.
(linguistics, of a language or word) An appearance in print or otherwise recorded on a permanent medium.
* 1997 , Roger Lass, Historical Linguistics and Language Change ,
* 2009 , Ingo Plag, Maria Braun, Sabine Lappe, Mareile Schramm, Introduction to English Linguistics ,
* 2010 , Kathryn Allan, Tracing metonymic polysemy through time: MATERIAL FOR OBJECT mappings in the OED'', Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari, Kathryn Allan (editors), ''Historical Cognitive Linguistics ,
As nouns the difference between testing and attestation
is that testing is the act of conducting a test; trialing, proving while attestation is a thing that serves to bear witness, confirm, authenticate, validation, verification, documentation.As a verb testing
is .As an adjective testing
is difficult, tough.testing
English
Verb
(head)Adjective
(en adjective)citation, page= , passage=England have now gone four games without a win at Wembley, their longest sequence without a victory in 30 years, and still have much work to do to reach Euro 2012 as they prepare for a testing trip to face Bulgaria in Sofia in September.}}
Noun
(en noun)- The wilderness testings of Jesus prepare him for ministry in which such temptations and shortcuts will recur.
Anagrams
*attestation
English
Noun
(Attested language) (en noun)page 23,
- So something must have been developing over long periods empty of attestation ; and whatever it was, it must (by principles to be discussed in the next section) have been a language of the usual kind.
page 110,
- For each word, the date of its first attestation in the English language, as documented in the Oxford English Dictionary'', and its frequency of occurrence in the ''British National Corpus are given.
page 176,
- Furthermore, the first attestations' given in the ''OED'' are not always the earliest '''attestations''' in print; since the first edition was finished in 1928, many earlier and later examples have been identified, and these will be incorporated into the third edition, currently underway (see Durkin 2002 for a discussion of how much this is likely to change the dates of '''attestation in the ''OED as a whole).
